
Your business, properly online
- Company and service sites
- Product catalogues with enquiry forms
- Landing pages for a campaign or a launch
- Fast on a phone, and patched every month
Fixed build, then a retainer
Home › Services › Applications
One team builds, hosts and runs all three. Web and mobile apps that take over a process now running on a spreadsheet, a WhatsApp group and somebody’s memory, nominal upfront, then priced per transaction. And a website that is maintained rather than launched and abandoned, on a monthly retainer.
One team for all three, and for the one somebody else left behind.

Fixed build, then a retainer

Nominal upfront, then per transaction

Nominal upfront, then per transaction

An honest assessment first
Your own process, in rupees a year.
The time a manual process takes, the errors it lets through and what they cost, then whether an app would pay for itself. It says so when a tidier spreadsheet is the better answer.
We are not trying to sell you a system of record. The work that pays for itself at this size is narrower and much less glamorous: the approval that waits three days in an inbox, the field report typed twice, the dispatch note reconciled by hand at month-end, the customer who calls because there is no other way to find out where their order is.
Each of those is a small application. Built well, it removes a person-week a month and stops being interesting, which is the point. Built as a platform programme, it takes nine months, arrives after the process has changed, and gets used by nobody.
Web or mobile follows the work. A browser app suits the office: approvals, portals, reports. A mobile app suits the people who are not at a desk: a technician on site, a driver at the door, a storekeeper in an aisle, often with patchy signal, so it keeps working offline and catches up when it reconnects. Most processes end up as both: the app in the field, and a web back office where someone checks what came in.
Most website work is sold as a launch. The site goes live, the invoice is paid, and eighteen months later it is running an unpatched CMS, nobody has the login, the contact form has been quietly failing since a plugin update, and the only person who knew how it was built has left the agency.
We build it, host it, and keep it: patched, backed up, monitored, and edited when the business changes. A fixed price for the build, then a monthly retainer for keeping it alive. The domain, the DNS and the hosting account are yours and stay in your name, so the site is never held hostage to a relationship.
Have something in mind already? Fill in the project brief: it asks only the questions that matter for a website, a web application or a mobile app, takes about twenty minutes, and comes back as a fixed-price proposal within two working days.
The usual quote for this work asks for the whole build cost before anything runs, which puts the entire risk on you: you pay for a working system on the promise that it will be one. A per-transaction price inverts that. The upfront figure is nominal, and we earn the rest only as the thing is used.
A transaction is defined per application and written into the contract: an approval processed, a report filed, an order tracked, an invoice raised. It is never a page view or a login, because that would let us bill you for people opening the app and finding it unhelpful.
Three things we will put in writing, because this model can be abused and you should hold us to them. There is a cap, so a good year cannot produce an absurd invoice. There is a floor and an exit: a minimum monthly figure that keeps the service staffed, and a buy-out price to convert to a flat fee if the volume grows past the point where per-transaction makes sense.
And the counting is yours to audit: the transaction log is in your database, not ours.
Each opens on its own. The rest of the page is the short version.
Some of what gets asked for is already solved by something you own. If the answer is a form in the tool you already pay for, a rethought approval matrix, or three columns added to an existing report, we will say so. There is no version of this pricing model where we are paid for building it anyway.
We are also the wrong people for a consumer product with a growth roadmap, for anything that needs a design team on retainer, or for a core banking or ERP replacement. We build internal process applications, and we would rather be clear about the edge of that than take the work and learn on your money.
Boring, current, widely-known technology, hosted on a major cloud, chosen so that any competent development team in India can pick it up if you ever want to bring it in-house. No framework nobody has heard of, and nothing that only works because we are the ones running it.
Where the application touches your network, identity or cloud accounts, it is built to the same controls as the rest of what we do: authentication against your directory rather than a separate password list, and logs that go somewhere the security work can see.
Mobile apps are built cross-platform, one codebase for Android and iPhone, and published under your own store accounts, so the listing is yours as well as the code.
Yours to keep, and to hand to anyone else, including a provider that isn't us.
Talk to us about thisWeb, mobile or both, doing the actual job, not a pilot that needs a second phase to be useful.
Yours from the first commit. If you take it elsewhere, it goes with you.
Environment, deployment, backups, monitoring and updates handled, not handed back as a to-do list.
What it does, what it assumes and where it stops, because that is the half nobody documents.
The ones that come up on nearly every first call.
Talk to us about thisBoth, and they are priced differently because they are different things. A website is a fixed build and a monthly retainer for hosting and maintenance. An application that takes over a business process is nominal upfront and then priced per transaction, so what you pay follows what you use. If you are not sure which one you need, describe the problem and we will tell you. They are often not the same answer as the one you arrived with.
Whatever the application exists to process, defined per application and written into the contract: an approval completed, a report filed, an order tracked, an invoice raised. Never a login or a page view. If the definition is not obvious for your process, that is a conversation before the contract rather than a dispute after it.
There is a cap in the contract, so a good year cannot produce an absurd invoice, and a buy-out price that converts the arrangement to a flat monthly fee. We would rather agree both up front than renegotiate with you at the point where you have no leverage.
You do, both, from the first commit. The source sits in your repository and the data in a database you can take a dump of at any time. Hosting it in our cloud account is a convenience, not a hold: we will migrate it to yours on request.
Sometimes. We will read the code and tell you honestly whether it is maintainable or whether you are better off rebuilding, and if it is the second, we will say what it would cost to do neither and keep limping along, because that is occasionally the right answer for a year.
No. If you are not, we host it and the application is often the least disruptive first thing to run there. It does not commit you to moving anything else.
Free, in your browser, and nothing is uploaded. Each one ends in a report you keep.
Tell us the symptom, not the service, and we'll say which of these applies, or that none of them do. A reply within one working day, from someone technical.
Most engagements start with one of these and grow into another.